“Extensible” Data Collected With Fillable PDF Forms

It’s obvious to anyone who has completed a “fillable form” PDF document that they are a quantum leap forward from old-style forms that require hand-written response. Forms are used for collecting data- if the quality and accuracy of your data is dependent on the handwriting skills of the end user, you are in trouble. The fillable form not only allows accurate interpretation by human readers reviewing individual forms, but is “extensible”, as the form field data from multiple forms can be exported into spreadsheet format for further review and analysis. This extensibility increases the value of your data
This increase in accuracy and efficiency creates immediate cost savings in data management for any organization that is currently using paper and pen to collect form information. EDCS specialists can quickly and economically convert your existing forms into interactive fillable forms, with the additional benefit of remediating the documents to ensure Section 508 compliance.
For more information on fillable forms, visit http://508fillableforms.com/ or the main EDCS website http://electronicdocumentcompliance.com/ .

The Straight Scoop on URLs in Section 508 Compliant Documents

Below is Section 1.8.1 from an SSA Guide to producing compliant Word-PDF documents.What do you think? Is this in conflict with standard HHS compliance checklist? Sounds like fully qualified URLs aren't really that important, and actually make a document LESS accessible. Make sure documents have proper tagging of hyperlinks for common sense accessibility:

When a Screen Reader is reading text and there is a link, the software will insert the word "Link" in front of the text to alert the user that this is a selectable hyperlink.

Another way that Screen Readers can access the links that are in a document is for them to call up a list of links. This list will display only the text that has been marked as a link.
It is important that the list of links makes sense to the user when it is read out of context. That is, the name of each link should make sense in the list when it is read in isolation.

Consider the following four examples of the same text and same link rendered using different methods:

1.    Please read The SSA Online Accessibility Policy. Click Here
2.    Please read The SSA Online Accessibility Policy. http://www.ssa.gov/webcontent/accessibility.htm
3.    Please visit The SSA Online Accessibility Policy.
If every link in the document was rendered using method #1, the list of links would read like this:
·         Click Here
·         Click Here
·         Click Here
·         Click Here
It is easy to see that individual links are not possible to read out of context.

If every link was rendered using method #2, the list would read like this:
·         http://www.ssa.gov/webcontent/accessibility.htm
·         http://ssa.gov/pgm/links_disability.htm
·         http://www.section508.gov/

This list also makes no sense in context. While we might be comfortable in normal conversation saying "go to s s a dot gov" we generally do not say to people "go to s s a dot gov slash p g m slash links underscore disability dot h t m". It is too long and it is too difficult to understand. However, when the list of links is presented this way, this is exactly how the Screen Reader will say each link.

If every link was rendered with method #3, the list would be read like this:

·         The SSA Online Accessibility Policy
·         SSA Disability Benefits
·         GSA's Section 508 website

Using this method, all of the links make sense when spoken out of context. This is the best method to use.

Where it is important to have the URL displayed on the printed page, Method #4 is the same as method #3, but with the URL also spoken in the list. This method is perfectly acceptable, so long as the name comes first and the URL comes last in each link.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

B) Development Methods

1.    Right click any hyperlink in the document.
2.    Make sure that in the Hyperlink dialog box the 'Text to display' field has a link name that makes sense when spoken in isolation.
Note: See Rationale, above for an explanation of how links are spoken by Screen Readers.

C) Testing Methods

Examine the document for instances of links that have names like 'Click Here', and/or links that are just URLs, like http://ssahost.ba.ssa.gov/arc/. These links need to be remediated according to Development Methods, above.

Specialists in Section 508 Compliant Fillable Forms

Electronic Document Compliance Services specializes in creating interactive "fill-in" forms for your PDFs. Fillable PDF forms can be accessed over the Internet or via email. If a PDF form includes form fields (for example, text fields, buttons, list boxes), users can fill the form online with Acrobat Reader. All EDCS created forms are compliant with Section 508, and can make your information easier to access for the end-user as well as document producers.

Additional advantages:
  • Share links to your documents through email, Twitter, or post it on your website or blog. 
  • Embed your forms directly into your web page. 
  • Analyze your data:  Sort and filter real-time data in an online table. 
  • View automatically generated charts of your data. 
  • Share form results with others simultaneously and manage collected responses online.
Accessible fillable forms benefit all users, not just sight-impaired users. Make your forms more efficient and valuable- contact EDCS today for quote and turnaround

The Basics of Section 508 PDF Compliance

The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the standard format for online "electronic" publication of documents. PDF allow the publisher to ensure that a document looks the same online as it does in print form. PDF's are unique in their "cross-platform" usability, and if they are constructed and tagged correctly they will look the same on different systems without having to install specialized fonts or rely on underlying operating system packages. Proper tagging of the visual and structural components of the document also ensures that the document will be accessible, meaning that assistive technologies (i.e. screen-readers like JAWS, etc.) provide the same information to visually impaired readers as to sighted readers. 

The primary requirement for an accessible, and therefore a compliant PDF, document is that the  tag structure fully represents the visual information provided by the document itself. The process to determine this requires the remediator to review each page in the document to ensure that it conforms to all the accessibility requirements and modify the tag structure of the page when required to ensure compliance.

The remediation is carried out at the global (document) level and by review of each page within the document. The workflow is straightforward, and upon completion the remediator tests the document's compliance using automatic checkers, such as Adobe Acrobat "Full 508" check, PAC, Common Look, etc., as well as a manual review process, both visual and using a screenreader. The remediated document and the remediation reports are delivered to the client along with notes on the work carried out.

Accessibility/compliance requirements of specific clients are different, as there is no legally binding set of PDF accessibility requirements  currently defined by the U.S. Access Board. Clients have some latitude in the manner in which they choose to develop PDF documents to conform to the Section 508 requirements.  For example, HHS has a comprehensive checklist for their contracted documents, but passing an item on the HHS checklist doesn't mean that the document is not compliant (i.e. the regulation is broad and doesn't get into details like URL formats). On the other hand, any document that passes all HHS checklist certainly is compliant.

The goal is accessibility for all; 21 million Americans have some disability, so documents that are accessible are not just "legal", but are more valuable because they provide universal access. Proper remediation is the key to accessibility.

The Truth About the Refresh: WCAG 2.0 It I!

In January 2017, the U.S. Access Board issued the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines, updating its ex...